Home / Health & personal care / Hair dryers / Compare
Dyson Supersonic Nural vs Shark FlexStyle vs Shark SpeedStyle
Too close to call: the right one depends on your home.
The verdict in 10 seconds
The Dyson Supersonic Nural suits you if
- You blow-dry often and want to go easier on your scalp and hair
- You have thick, wavy or curly hair and want faster drying
- You like a light, quiet dryer that remembers your favorite settings
Skip it if
- You want a dryer that feels like a sensible value
- You want controls right on the handle rather than on the back
- You rely on easy, quick access to replacement parts and support
The Shark FlexStyle suits you if
- You want one tool that dries and styles your hair
- You have straight, wavy, or fine hair and like sleek or loosely waved looks
- You're new to curling and want something forgiving and easy to learn
Skip it if
- You have very thick or coily hair and want defined curls
- You're sensitive to a loud, high-pitched motor
- You only need a basic dryer and don't want to pay for extras
The Shark SpeedStyle suits you if
- You want one tool for drying, smoothing and volume
- You travel and want a compact dryer
- You worry about heat damage and like the dryer to manage the temperature
Skip it if
- You want quick grab-and-go styling with no learning curve
- You already own a similar Shark multi-styler
- You want air-curling barrels for bouncy curls
So, which one?
These are closely matched, so pick by what your home needs. The Dyson Supersonic Nural suits you if you blow-dry often and want to go easier on your scalp and hair. The Shark FlexStyle suits you if you want one tool that dries and styles your hair. The Shark SpeedStyle suits you if you want one tool for drying, smoothing and volume.
We researched 17 expert reviews, analyzed 23,113 owner ratings and comments across 14 sources for the three, and cross-checked them into one verdict, so you don't have to.
Show me the receipts
The scoreboardProduct Review score 84 vs 83 vs 87 · reliability 70 vs 92 vs 92
| Dyson Supersonic Nural | Shark FlexStyle | Shark SpeedStyle | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Product Review score | 84 | 83 | 87 |
| Experts | 90 | 82 | 86 |
| Owners | 84 | 79 | 86 |
| Reliability | 70 | 92 | 92 |
| Report problems | 12% | 3% | 3% |
| Evidence | 7 reviews · 479 comments | 3 reviews · 573 comments | 7 reviews · 91 comments |
| Typical price | $372–$500 | $279.99–$349.99 | $169–$260 |
● marks the better number on each row.
Experts vs ownersExperts 90 vs 82 vs 86 · Owners 84 vs 79 vs 86
Dyson Supersonic Nural
Shark FlexStyle
Shark SpeedStyle
How we reached each verdictThe numbers behind each model's score
Dyson Supersonic Nural
We analyzed 7 expert sources (6 hands-on) and 479 owner comments, 420 of them first-hand, and the picture is strong: experts score it 90 and owners 84. Fast drying is the top owner theme (26%), followed by light weight and quiet operation (15% each), and every expert praises the Scalp Protect and attachment-memory features. Value is the main split: 14% of owners call it poor value against 9% who feel it's worth it, and every hands-on expert flags the price. Reliability is the weaker spot at 70, with 12% of comments mentioning failures and 7% describing a unit that broke or died; retailer ratings also vary widely, from 3.35 stars on just 26 retailer reviews to 4.8 across about 16,000 votes on Google, so the low-end figures rest on thin samples.
Shark FlexStyle
We analyzed three hands-on expert evaluations, one based on nearly two years of use, along with 573 owner comments, 494 of them first-hand, plus about 3,700 retail ratings. All three experts call it well built and effective, especially as a dryer, and owners most often praise its value (13%) and fast drying (13%). Complaints are scattered: 5% of owners mention noise, 4% feel it's poor value, and only 3% of comments mention failures, which supports a strong reliability score of 92. The evidence is thin on the expert side, with only three hands-on assessments and two published scores, so our confidence is medium.
Shark SpeedStyle
We analyzed 7 expert evaluations (6 hands-on) and 91 owner comments, 62 of them first-hand, and the picture is consistently positive: all 6 hands-on experts found it fast-drying, and 16% of owners say the same. Value is the top owner theme at 21%, with 12% praising frizz control, though 6 of 7 experts call it expensive at full price, and 3 flag a learning curve with the attachments. Reliability looks strong, with failure mentions in just 3% of comments, 2 of them about overheating or shutting off, and no recalls on record. Confidence is low because the owner sample is small, although the 4.3-star Amazon average across 1,600 ratings points the same way.
Where each one falls shortThe most common complaints
Dyson Supersonic Nural
- Very high price for a hair dryer
- Some units failing and frustrating customer support
- Scalp Protect can be fiddly and adds a little drying time
Shark FlexStyle
- Loud, high-pitched motor
- Curling struggles with thick hair and needs practice
- Still expensive, and not every kit includes a case
Shark SpeedStyle
- Expensive at full price
- Attachments take practice and are slow to swap
- Heat can feel too hot near the roots
Questions people actually ask
Which is better, the Dyson Supersonic Nural or the Shark FlexStyle or the Shark SpeedStyle?
Neither, clearly. They're closely matched, so choose by your floors, pets and budget.
Based on: Product Review score 84 vs 83 vs 87.Which is more reliable?
Neither stands out. The three have a similar record.
Based on: Reliability 70 vs 92 vs 92; problems mentioned by 12% vs 3% vs 3% of owners.Which is easier to live with day to day?
It's a draw. Day to day, the three are about as satisfying.
Based on: Owners score 84 vs 79 vs 86, from ratings and comments.Which is cheaper?
The Shark SpeedStyle usually costs less.
Based on: Typical prices: Dyson Supersonic Nural $372–$500; Shark FlexStyle $279.99–$349.99; Shark SpeedStyle $169–$260.As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. It never changes a score.